This post has been inspired by a rather alarming trend I’ve noticed whilst looking through WordPress for new parrot blogs to follow. It’s not limited to blogging, but is in fact largely an issue of the Internet in general. It’s also the post that will probably incite rage. Apologies in advance.
The trend happens to be some informational blogs posting very brief, generic how-tos on breeding and hand-rearing parrots. I find it alarming. By ‘informational,’ I’m not talking about specialised sites, but those ‘bit of everything’ blogs. You know, they literally cover all kinds of topics: how to better yourself, how to dress well or spend less money, how to begin underwater basket-weaving, how to breed parrots. More relevantly, as far as I can glean, the people behind those blogs have no prior experience with either parrots or breeding.
And, of course, the Internet is itself laden with ‘how-to’ articles. Dare I call them dangerous? After all, so few of them teach that breeding your birds involves huge health risks, adds to a growing population of homeless birds, and has so many absolutely vital things to be taken into consideration – including a highly specialised diet. They often promote an ‘experience the cycle of life’ outlook, combined with ‘it’s nature.’ Unfortunately, this doesn’t take into account the homeless parrot problem, or the responsibility and expense of baby birds, or even the wild nature of parrots themselves that makes them unsuitable for many homes.
Before I go off on a full-blown tangent, the debate of hand-reared versus parent-reared is an time-old one.
At first, I was very firmly on the ‘hand-reared’ side – but I hadn’t done all the research yet. We had just bought Mishka at that point, so first parrot, and a pet shop one at that. She was a neurotic mess. At the time, I made the connection parent-reared = neuroses.
If you’ve been following this blog for any length of time, you’ll know that I’m very much against pet shops selling birds. It took me awhile to realise that the issue wasn’t necessarily our cockatiel’s parent-reared upbringing, but rather her pet shop experience.
Honestly, if it weren’t for her pet shop beginning, Mishka would be the most stable of our flock. She never, ever displays sexual behaviour towards us. She does get a bit hormonal and therefore moody, but her ensuing behaviour is nothing like the other birds’, two of whom can be downright dangerous. She will also remove herself from any situation she doesn’t like, and rarely bites. Now, as I write, Bobo is rubbing his wings on the protruding bit of his java perch (gotta move that around a bit). He would be rubbing, erm, other bits of himself on there, if he could. Mavi has also been extremely nippy this week, and Ptak has thrice performed the dreaded wiggle-neck dance to various household objects. What? That drying rack was sexy.
Ptak, Bobo, and Maverick are hand-reared. Well, okay. I’m going out on a limb on the latter two; judging by their desire to take a human mate, plus ensuing behaviours, that’s my guess. Looking at people as a mate just isn’t a natural behaviour for any parrot.
During hand-rearing, the eggs are removed from some point at the parent’s nest. The actual time span can vary; breeders may even leave the eggs until a certain point after they’ve hatched, though they usually do so soon after being laid, and artificially incubate the eggs instead. Some breeders do this to encourage more laying for a greater profit, and some more nobly to imprint the baby and make it more pliable, with the intention of helping it adjust to a human environment.
But there is research that says that hand-rearing is actually detrimental to the baby’s development. After all, how will it learn how to be a bird, if it is only raised around humans and other human-raised babies?
There is strong evidence that if young are taken away from the mother at a young age, behavioural and adjustment problems will result due to a developmental disorder in the brains. It is not for nothing that the Dutch Health and Welfare Act states that puppies and kittens may not be removed from the mother within their first 7 weeks. The same applies to the ban on taking infant monkeys away from the mother.’
Read more from the Dutch Parrot Foundation.
It isn’t natural, and it makes sense that removing a baby bird from its nest would have a serious impact. It misses out on birdie behavioural lessons right from the start.
From reading online, many argue that hand-rearing must be done to maintain a sociable and tame pet, yet I find that untrue. It does certainly take more time and effort to earn the trust of a parent-raised baby. But that doesn’t mean it’s impossible. Mishka has become – or maybe is still becoming – a very tame bird. She has her issues, but I generally attribute those to her days in the pet shop, with a too-small cage, seed diet, no enrichment, faces popping in to stare, rough handling, and the abrupt loss (sale) of her companion. She’s also become a confident, curious bird.
According to Greg Glendell,
‘The process of hand-rearing has adverse effects on the behaviour of African grey parrots when they mature (Schmid, Doherr and Steiger 2005)… [T]he hand-rearing, or what we might more accurately call parental deprivation, sets in place a behavioural time-bomb with a 2- to 5-year delay in behavioural problems. Indeed, according to Schmid, et al. the maladaptive behaviours of hand-reared birds appears to be largely in proportion to the amount of parental deprivation they have experienced. Where birds are part-parent raised (not removed from the nest until at least 8 weeks old) they suffer fewer behavioural problems as adults than those which have been solely hand-reared from the day of hatching. In addition to adverse behavioural issues caused by hand-rearing, there can be adverse physical effects including osteodystrophy (Harcourt-Brown, 2003, 2004).’
He mentions also that profit is a motivator for some breeders who choose to hand-rear. These people rush the weaning process in order to make a sale and move on to the next clutch of babies. Birds who are weaned too soon have other documented, lasting issues, including regression.
And there it comes down to the sister issue of hand-rearing: breeding. Yes, or no – is it acceptable? I personally say no – from everything I’ve witnessed of parrots, they are not meant to be pets.
I love my flock, and I would not change them. They are wild animals
destroying living in my home, and I accept that and cater for it. The issue is the average owner who can or will not, or the casual buyer who just thinks parrots are ‘pretty.’ These birds (with the intelligence of a 5-year-old and the emotional capacity of a 3-year-old) get passed from hand to hand, home to home, and that is not fair on them. They remember.
The solution, of course, is to promote adoption and rescue. Even so, that simply won’t happen for everyone – not to mention that not every new owner is capable of taking on the emotional ‘baggage’ of a re-homing case.
Obviously what I’m saying in this post isn’t backed up by scientific observation. It’s from my experiences with four parrots, and is hardly representative of the larger population. The person linked below found the original study (and performed her own), but the link to the original has expired. Check it out. I’m going to keep researching this one.
Please, feel free to share your thoughts! Also, if you have a moment to spare, I’ve updated my ‘links of interest,’ which includes some of the blogs and resources I’ve been enjoying.
P.S. No idea what’s going on with the small text, but will try to resolve that.